Page 395 - KCMO Parks Master Plan 2032
P. 395

OTHER
        OTHER



                CILITY
            A

        FACILITY
        F

        ASSESSMENTS
        ASSESSMENTS




              Between March, and May of 2023, the consultant    interconnected access routes to the facility.
              team visited and assessed 7 other various facilities
              that the department owns and maintains across the   VISIBILITY OF ENTRANCES AND USE AREAS
              system.  In some cases these bauildings are leased   1 being a facility that is not visible and not
              and maintained by the tenant.  In other cases, they   recognized versus 5 being a facility that is highly
              are vacant and awaiting a new use.  Those visits   visible and immediately recognized as a KC Parks
              included taking photos of each property, creating   and Recreation operations facility.
              an inventory of amenities, and evaluating each
              facility based on the questionnaire detailed in the   APPARENT ADA COMPLIANCE
              following pages.                                  1 being a facility that appears to offer no accessible
                                                                routes from public way to the facility, versus 5 being
              The assessment was based on four criteria:        a facility that appears to offer ADA-compliant
              accessibility, character, operations, and conditions.   access to the facility.
              Those criteria were further broken down into 20
              measurements of success, each worth 5 points.         OVERALL ATTRACTIVENESS
              The assessment produced a total score between     1 being a facility which is perceived to be uninviting
              20 and 100 points and a rating of either poor (0-24   and underutilized, versus 5 being a facility which is
              points), fair 25-49 points), good (50-74 points), or   perceived to be inviting, safe, and impeccably well-
              excellent (75-100 points).                        maintained.

            questionnaire                                       FEELING OF SAFETY

                                                                1 being a facility which induces the feel of danger
              EASE IN WALKING TO THE FACILITY                   due  to  poor  visibility,  limited  access,  tall  and
              1 being a facility with poor access to and from   opaque fences, and unmaintained spaces, versus
              adjacent streets or neighborhoods due to lack of   5 being a facility that evokes feelings of safety
              sidewalks, shade trees, or limited street crossings,   through visible and well-positioned entry points,
              versus 5 being ADA accessible on wide shaded      lighting and well-maintained spaces.
              sidewalks with pedestrian street crossings, an
              interconnected sidewalk system, and multiple      HISTORICAL OR CULTURAL SIGNIFICANCE
              street frontages.                                 1 being a facility that meets none of the contributing
                                                                factors  for  historical  significance  versus  5  being
              MULTI-MODAL CAPACITY                              a facility that meets all contributing factors based
              1 being a poorly connected facility that relies solely   on  the  National  Register  Standards  such  as
              on  automobile  access  for  employees,  versus  5   related historical events, persons or type/period/
              being a facility that facilitates multiple modes of   construction method and is greater than 50 years
              transportation through the provision of bike racks   old.
              or sidewalks that lead to transit stops, as well as


                                                                                                                  389
   390   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400